- Voting is political homeopathy.
- If voting changed anything, they’d make it illegal.
- Vote all you want — the government won’t change.
- There’s an unelected secret government calling the shots.
- A shattering new study by two political science professors has found that ordinary Americans have virtually no impact whatsoever on the making of national policy in our country.
- Elections function as a heat-sink in the machine of the American government, harmlessly redirecting the impulse toward political participation and absorbing it into a ritual.
- Each of four theoretical traditions in the study of American politics—which can be characterized as theories of Majoritarian Electoral Democracy, Economic-Elite Domination, and two types of interest-group pluralism, Majoritarian Pluralism and Biased Pluralism—offers different predictions about which sets of actors have how much influence over public policy: average citizens; economic elites; and organized interest groups, mass-based or business-oriented.
A great deal of empirical research speaks to the policy influence of one or another set of actors, but until recently it has not been possible to test these contrasting theoretical predictions against each other within a single statistical model. We report on an effort to do so, using a unique data set that includes measures of the key variables for 1,779 policy issues.
Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no independent influence. The results provide substantial support for theories of Economic-Elite Domination and for theories of Biased Pluralism, but not for theories of Majoritarian Electoral Democracy or Majoritarian Pluralism.
|Christine on А у вас негров линчуют|
|wao tube on The emergence of pillarization…|
|kolesterol on The emergence of pillarization…|
|Neoreaction on Nothing ever changes: Comstock…|
|53Remont.Ru on The emergence of pillarization…|
- December 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
academia Africa Ali Khamenei America amish anticolonialism art atomization Benedict Anderson Benjamin Franklin bureaucracy capitalism Cathedral China Christian Smith CIA Cold War colonialism Communism Conquest's Second Law critical theory culture culture of politics culture wars cyclical history Darren Staloff deep state democracy demography diversity economics election 2016 exosemantics FDR fnords formalism Frankfurt School Hastings Banda Herbert Marcuse history immigration Iran Islam linguistics Malawi Marxism Massachusetts mass immigration media Mencius Mencius Moldbug music narratives nationalism Netherlands Peggy Dennis pillarization politics primitivism progressivism Puritanism rationality Russia school system secession Seth Roberts Sino-Tibetan sociology status Sweden technology thede dynamics todo Usonia Xia Jisong